顯示具有 yahoo 標籤的文章。 顯示所有文章
顯示具有 yahoo 標籤的文章。 顯示所有文章

Yahoo! 公佈 iPad 使用族群分佈

>> 2010/05/21

Yahoo! 月初公佈了一份關於 iPad 的使用者分佈結構,對於考慮建構服務來針對 iPad 或是相關族群的公司 / 開發人員相當有幫助。簡單的條列一下摘要:

  • iPad 族群以男性佔多數,大約是女性的兩倍。
  • iPad 使用者年齡多半位於 35-44 歲之間。考慮 iPad 初發售時期售價偏高,購入族群多半屬於經濟寬裕者,這個年齡層頗為合理。
  • 使用者使用的 Yahoo! 服務和一般 web user 頗為雷同,但是針對 flickr 的用量卻是一般 average web user 的 143%,也顯示 iPad 族群對多媒體的需求高。
  • 雖然目前 iPad只在美國正式發售,然而已經有 10% 的 iPad 使用者從海外造訪 Yahoo!。
  • 有 iPad 的使用者有 iPhone 是很正常的,使用 iPad 上 Yahoo! 的使用者有半數左右也使用 iPhone 上 Yahoo!。
  • 最後這點不知道 Yahoo! 怎麼推估的,不過 Yahoo! 認為初期使用 iPad 的族群比一般使用者更重要,他們對周圍朋友的影響力比一般人高 94%。
上述資料當然是 Yahoo! 依據自己的 log 資料得出的結論,但是考慮 Yahoo! 的 userbase 規模,想來和整個 internet 的統計數據也不會有多少差異。

(不過我更想知道的是,有沒有以州 / 國 來區分的 browser user demographics 詳細資料啊...)

有興趣的人可以去看全文。

Read more...

另一個最佳化網站的工具 - Google Page Speed

>> 2009/06/05

以前,唯一能拿來最佳化 (或者,優化) 網頁速度、網站設定的工具,就只有 YSlow。在 YSlow 出現以前,更只有 IBM 的 Page Detailer 可以用。正因為 IBM Page Detailer 不太 active,對於衡量網頁瀏覽速度又不夠理想,當初 Yahoo 才會開發 YSlow。

YSlow問世以後,加上 Yahoo 研究並公佈的一些網站製作最佳化準則,外界才有可以依循的標準,也才有量化指標可以衡量一個網頁的速度。YSlow 被公佈之後,整個網路世界都不一樣了。尤其是對前端製作的 web developer 更是如此。

不過YSlow 作者 Steve Souders 在 2008 年被 Google 挖角了。跳槽以後, 大家都等著在瞧兩件事情:

  1. YSlow 會不會維持以往的 active?
  2. Steve Souders 進 Google 以後,會不會繼續做類似的產品?
顯然兩個答案都是 yes。YSlow 仍然持續在演進,而很多人都注意到,Google 現在也公佈了他們類似 YSlow 的新工具:Google Page Speed。

乍看之下,Google Page Speed 和 YSlow 實在是很像的東西。都一樣是 firebug 的 plugin,甚至連介面都和前一版的 YSlow 非常雷同。而 Google Page Speed 的最佳化規範,雖然撰寫格式和 YSlow 準則不一樣,但是如果你仔細看,其實背後的精神和理論基礎都是一致的。

不過,即使是很類似的工具,還是有若干不同之處。新推出的 Google Page Speed 也有勝出的地方,例如:
  1. Page Speed 比 YSlow 檢查的更嚴格,項目更多更挑剔
  2. Page Speed 針對 CSS 的各種 performance issue 跑的更仔細,而且會直接列出可以修正的地方
  3. 雖然 YSlow 也有提供 SmushIt 來 optimize 圖片檔,但是還是背後傳到 server 上再讓你下載。相比之下, Page Speed 直接在 plugin 內就把 optimize 過的圖片給你,用起來比較方便。
  4. 有趣的是,若干 YUI CSS 的內容被 Google Page Speed 拿出來挑毛病了 XDDD
  5. 不過,YSlow 的介面還是比較好看 XDDD
當然,Google Page Speed 不可能是為了「不甘寂寞」而做出來打 YSlow 的工具,很顯然是他們需要比 YSlow 更多的項目來自動化檢驗網頁內容,就如同當年 Yahoo 不使用 IBM Page Detailer 一樣。

不過,我比較好奇的是,等到 chrome 的 extension 機制成熟以後,Google Page Speed 是否會移植到 chrome 上?還是會 chrome 跟 firefox 雙棲? 這想必是 Steve Souders之後要頗費神的事情了。

Read more...

所以,楊致遠即將要下台了。

>> 2008/11/19

事情的演變告訴我們,就如同量子力學的測不準原理一般,世事發展不會盡如所料。但是,趨勢的脈絡卻是相去不遠的。

年初,當微軟提議併購 Yahoo! 的時候,我就說:

如果你問我,我覺得 Yahoo 是否應該答應?我會說,"the short answer is yes"。
你想問更詳細一點的話,我會說,"the long answer is a bit longer, but it's still yes"
為什麼?因為不管用任何理由來看,我都看不出來 Yahoo! 有能力在短期內,讓股價爬的比微軟出價更高。既然如此,在高點出脫給微軟,不就是對股東最好的交代?當時,常有朋友問我對這案子的看法。我也鐵口直斷的說,「必定會成交」。我的理由是:
  1. 當時就看的出來,全球經濟局勢依天比一天壞。雅虎不趁這個價格賣,三五年內絕對沒這種好價格。
  2. 如果楊致遠不肯賣,鐵定會有嗜血的資本家跳出來逼宮賺取價差。(果不其然,後來 Icahn 加入戰局,大舉購入雅虎股票,並且威脅董事會就範)
  3. 如果楊致遠還是不願意妥協,那麼微軟極可能結合 (2) 中的資本家角色,來發動董事會投票戰,撤換董事會之後拉楊致遠下台。然後換一個聽話的 CEO,上台繼續併購案。 (Icahn 當初的聲明也很有這種味道)
  4. 即使楊致遠可以抵擋 (2) 和 (3) 的情勢,那麼由於 (1) 的關係,事後很可能會證明公司股價無法達到微軟出價的高點。那麼楊致遠自己的位子恐怕怎麼也坐不住了。
因此,總結各種因素,我怎麼看都認為微軟買 Yahoo 根本是已成定局的事情。甚至當初在 Icahn 開砲的時候我也說,
如果說 Icahn 採取行動以前,沒有和微軟達成某種程度的協議的話,我是不相信的。
結果,人算不如天算。完全出乎我的意料之外,Yahoo 董事會和 Icahn 之間達成了共識,由 Icahn 方面佔取兩席董事。當然協議的內容外界無從得知,我們也無法了解到底 Yahoo 董事會給了 Icahn 些什麼檯面下的東西。總之我們知道,最後微軟的併購案被扔出窗外,宣告破局。

後來,隨著雷曼兄弟、AIG、美林等金融機構地雷接連爆發,舉世皆知的「金融海嘯」發生了。11/6,楊致遠對外公開說,他仍然認為 Yahoo 和微軟的結合「是最好的方案」。在金融市場的一般解讀,傳達出的訊息是「楊致遠放棄抵抗,決定還是放手了。」

就在今天,消息傳出,楊致遠即將交棒。Yahoo 目前正在尋找下任 CEO 的可能人選,物色到適當的人物之後,楊致遠即將下台一鞠躬。

楊致遠下臺的理由是什麼?是疲累倦怠?心灰意冷?還是被逼宮下台?我不知道。
但是我知道,在微軟和 Yahoo 購併案破局的那一刻開始,這個事情就不遠了。

[Update] 有人問我,楊致遠下臺是不是在「搬開石頭」讓微軟可以放手買?我覺得倒是很難說。理由是:
  1. 首先,微軟到目前為止,都還沒有再度公開說過他們有意購買雅虎。
  2. 其次,即使微軟仍然有意購買,現在估價的水準一定會比年初的時候低上許多。雅虎股價和年初相比已經不只是腰斬,如果微軟現在出價有當初的六折已經是很慷慨了。那麼,雅虎現在的董事會願意接受這麼低的出價嗎?尤其是幾個月前才拒絕這麼高的價格?
  3. 再其次,即使微軟有意購買、也有意思出高價,但是現在的環境恐怕不允許他們這樣做。微軟自己股價也跌了不少,各大銀行現在也都緊縮信用銀根。要一口氣買雅虎這麼大的公司是不可能不融資的。但是現在的信用環境和銀行氣氛,對這種大規模融資案並不那麼歡迎。簡單的說,就是微軟的融資成本會比年初高上許多。因此即使微軟有意出價,恐怕也是有心無力,不一定吃的下來。
但是話又說回來了,人算總是不如天算。讓我們慢慢靜看事態發展吧。

Read more...

很好很強大的「大神」

>> 2008/08/14

今天被敲了一下,看到「大神」xdite 在 twitter 上面提到 (here and there),說「yapache 最大的特點就是阻擋訊息 999」。雖然在 xdite 的部落格看到光怪陸離的言論已經見怪不怪了,但是看到這種說法還是有點哭笑不得。xdite 對 yapache 很了解嗎?這種說法聽起來就好像是跟別人說:「我從 google 丟 A 跟 B 查詢的結果分別是 C 和 D,所以我可以告訴你 Google 的搜尋引擎設計的機制應該是 blah blah...」... 你覺得這種說法有多少可信度?

肚子沒墨水,只靠直覺和經驗下判斷,當然就會有許多似是而非的言論出現。今天鬧這種笑話也就不奇怪了。

真的想知道 yapache 的「特點」的話,還是先從已公開的 Michael Radwin 在 apachecon 上面的演講看起吧。至少會有個頭緒 Yahoo! 的 apache 到底 hack 了些什麼東西。光是根據經驗亂發謬論,沒被踢爆還真的滿特別的。畢竟當年 xdite 捅無名不可謂不兇啊,就算有現世報也不稀奇吧。

Read more...

flickr 創辦人夫婦離職

>> 2008/06/19

知名相簿社群網站 Flickr 的創辦人夫婦,Stewart Butterfield 和 Caterina Fake,都已經或即將要離開 Yahoo 了。

其實這並不是什麼新聞,遠在去年年尾就不斷有馬路消息的傳聞出現。但是具有指標意義的人離開,多少還是有衝擊性的。這個消息最讓人感興趣的,還是 Stewart 寫的離職信。信件圖檔已經在網路上傳開,我把原圖貼在下面。真的很有 Butterfield style 啊 :p

stewart butterfield resignation letter

另一方面,對 Yahoo 來說,隨著指標性人物的大規模離職,似乎也表示谷底的時刻終於來了。可以想見的是,等到黑夜過去,又會是另一個黎明。不過漫漫長夜總是比較難熬啊。1998 年的 Apple,和 96 年的 IBM,也是都走過這一遭的。

Read more...

Yahoo 終於開放通訊錄的 API 了

>> 2008/06/05

等的好久啊...

以前 Yahoo Mail 剛推出 API 的時候,很多人都在紛紛詢問,到底要怎麼撈通訊錄的名單呢?當時的官方說法是,根本不提供這個 API。但是像是 flickr 的 friends finder 就很明顯有內部的 api 可以使用,也因此被不少人詬病說開放只開一半。

但是這方面的需求始終不少,所以很多人都用一些旁門左道的方式來撈 - 比方說把使用者的寄信匣中的收件人撈一次,可以得到類似通訊錄的效果。

現在開始終於不用走這些旁門左道啦。今天看到,Yahoo Addressbook 終於也開放了 API 可以讀取。以後如果要讓 user 互相匯入匯出使用者資料就方便多囉。

雖然是這樣,但是公告上面每天 5000 個 queries 還是實在有點小氣。大一點的網站,像是 LinkedIn 提供的功能,每個小時就不只 5000 個 queries 了吧?不過雖然小氣了點,至少隔了一年多 API 總是開出來了,也算是踏出了好的開始啊。

原始 blog post 在這邊。

Read more...

Yahoo 正式回應 Icahn 的公開信

>> 2008/05/16

好戲果然就應該連播不停...

昨晚 Icahn 發表公開信,表明要發動 proxy battle 撤換 Yahoo 董事會以後,不到 12 小時,Yahoo 董事長 Roy Bostock 也發了正式的回應。

因為 Icahn 擺明他的目標就是要讓 Yahoo 重回談判桌跟微軟協商,Roy Bostock 在信中也指出,

「請容我提醒你,『現在』並沒有微軟、或是其他公司提出的購併提案。」
「你準備強迫 Yahoo 賣給一個前求婚者,而這家公司已經公開宣稱他們『繼續前行』。我們並不相信這符合 Yahoo 股東的利益。」
信中除了辯解和微軟協商的過程,表示雅虎並沒有一開始就拒人於千里之外以外,也不忘記強調,
「Yahoo 目前的十人董事會,包括 CEO 楊致遠,仍然是最能夠讓 Yahoo 股東權益最佳化的團隊。」
Bostock 為董事會的決策辯護是可以理解的。至於賣給微軟是對還是錯?這種問題當然沒有答案。Icahn 當然可以藉著逼使雅虎賣給微軟大賺一票,但是對楊致遠和 David Filo 來說則是情何以堪。但是,感情和面子是不能夠在資本市場上說服投資人的。雅虎過去四年的股價曲線實在不好,現在的董事會要怎麼讓投資人相信,雅虎可以憑藉一己之力力挽狂瀾,這才是當務之急的重點。

好戲連篇。我們就等著看這段,彷如 Oracle 和 BEA Systems 重演的戲碼吧。

[註] Bostock 公開回應的全文可以在這邊看到。我照引如下。

May 15, 2008
Dear Mr. Icahn:

We are in receipt of your letter with regard to your intention to seek control of Yahoo!'s board of directors.

Unfortunately, your letter reflects a significant misunderstanding of the facts about the Microsoft proposal and the diligence with which our board evaluated and responded to that proposal. A fair-minded review of the factual record leads to one conclusion: that Yahoo!'s ten-member board, comprised of nine independent directors along with Yahoo! CEO Jerry Yang, remains the best and most qualified group to maximize value for all Yahoo! stockholders.

Conversely, we do not believe it is in the best interests of Yahoo! stockholders to allow you and your hand-picked nominees to take control of Yahoo! for the express purpose of trying to force a sale of Yahoo! to a formerly interested buyer who has publicly stated that they have moved on. Please may I remind you that there is currently no acquisition offer on the table from that company or any other party. That said, we have been crystal clear in our stance that we have been and remain willing to consider any proposal from any party including Microsoft if it offers our stockholders full and certain value.

From the beginning of the process with Microsoft, Yahoo!'s independent directors focused on one central goal: how best to maximize stockholder value. At all times directing this process, Yahoo!'s independent directors carefully considered Microsoft's initial unsolicited proposal, which was at the time valued at $31 per share. After considering input from its financial advisers the board unanimously concluded that Microsoft's proposal significantly undervalued Yahoo! and was, therefore, not in the best interests of the company or our stockholders. While we rejected this offer publicly on February 11, 2008, we could not have been more clear in that communication and in every subsequent communication, both public and private, that we were and are willing to enter into any transaction that would maximize value for stockholders and provide them certainty of value.

The record of our efforts to engage Microsoft in meaningful discussions is unequivocal. Following receipt of Microsoft's proposal on January 31, our board of directors has met over twenty times to review Microsoft's proposal and Yahoo!'s other strategic alternatives. Throughout this process our board kept an open mind and an open ear. Our independent directors met with several of our largest stockholders to solicit their views and to make it clear that Yahoo!'s independent board is fully committed to maximizing stockholder value. In addition, at the direction of our board, our management team met with many of our investors to provide insight into Yahoo!'s strategy and views on value.

Our board's openness also extended to Microsoft. Without reciting all of the contacts between us and between our advisers, the senior-most management of Yahoo! and Microsoft and the companies' respective financial advisers spoke on numerous occasions and met in person seven times. During those meetings, Yahoo! discussed its strategic objectives in search and display advertising monetization, its perspectives on operating strategy and integration in a transaction with Microsoft, its perspectives on transaction synergies, and other non-price deal terms. Because certainty of closing is a critical issue, we sought to understand Microsoft's thinking with regard to the regulatory issues associated with a potential transaction. In fact, at the board's direction, our lawyers on March 28 asked for additional information in this regard, information which was never forthcoming.

On April 15th, a meeting was held at Yahoo!'s request. At that meeting, which included our respective financial advisors, we made clear, once again, that we were open to a transaction with Microsoft. During those discussions, Yahoo! made a detailed presentation of its strategic and financial plan, its thoughts on integration and its view with respect to the potential synergies that could be achieved in a transaction, essentially laying the foundation for Microsoft to understand--and respond to--our board's conclusion that Microsoft's offer substantially undervalued the company. Following that meeting we also provided to Microsoft a list of key non-price deal terms that our board believed were critical items to be addressed in a deal to provide reasonable protections for our stockholders.

Throughout this period, Microsoft continued to state that it would not raise its offer, and even suggested that it could lower it.

Despite this failure by Microsoft to respond in any substantive way to any of Yahoo!'s requests, on May 2nd, the same day we first learned of Microsoft's apparent willingness to increase its proposal to $33 (although this oral "offer" was never delivered in writing and did not include details of a cash/stock mix), our board determined to continue discussions, instructing Jerry Yang to indicate to Microsoft that we would be prepared to enter into a transaction that valued Yahoo! at $37 per share and that provided reasonable certainty of value and certainty of closing. This was communicated to Microsoft in-person at a meeting in Seattle on May 3rd. With Microsoft's offer at $33 and Yahoo!'s counter-proposal at $37, Microsoft elected, within hours, to walk away from the negotiating table and informed us that they were "moving on," having never engaged further on price or any of the key non-price deal terms.

In short, Yahoo!'s board was at every point in this process prepared to enter into a transaction with Microsoft that would maximize stockholder value--and included certainty of value and closing. What Yahoo!'s independent board refused to do was to allow control of this company to be acquired for less than its full value.

That brings us to today. Our business is performing well as evidenced by our first quarter results. As we have publicly stated, our board continues to actively and expeditiously explore strategic alternatives to maximize stockholder value. None of the alternatives we are considering would preclude us from entering into a transaction with Microsoft or any other party.

We continue to believe that Yahoo!'s current board has the independence, the knowledge, and the commitment to navigate the Company through the rapidly changing Internet environment and to deliver value for Yahoo! and its stockholders.

We look forward to a productive dialogue.

Very truly yours,

Roy Bostock

Chairman of the Board

Read more...

鉅子 Carl Icahn 對 Yahoo 董事會開砲了

雖然最近忙到翻掉,但是看到這麼戲劇性的東西,還是要寫一下當紀念的 :p

就在 Steve Ballmer 說微軟決定撤回對 Yahoo 的併購案之後,今晚 Carl Icahn 對 Yahoo 董事會開砲了,發表了一封公開信。這位老兄好怒啊。他形容雅虎董事會

「躲在管理階層過度樂觀的財務預測後面,十分不負責任。」
他也說,
「微軟的提案十分慷慨,對雅虎的估價比公開求婚的前一天還要高出 72%。拒絕這個提議顯然是非常不理智的。」
實力雄厚的 Carl Icahn,除了開罵以外,也擺明他不是只有一張嘴而已。公開信中聲稱,他已經花了十三億美金買了雅虎五千九百萬股 (大約佔雅虎 4% 股權)。而且他正在向美國聯邦交易委員會提出申請,希望得到反托拉斯的許可,以便買下價值二十五億美金的雅虎股權 (大約 8% 左右)。

Icahn 表示不只贊成微軟的購併案,而且也打算提案撤換雅虎的董事會 - 他已經公開提了一個十人名單,希望能夠在七月三號的雅虎股東年會上面,取得多數董事席位。十人都是赫赫有名,除了他自己以外,還包括:
  • 網路創業傳奇人物 Mark Cuban
  • Viacom 創辦人 Frank Biondi Jr.
  • New Line Cenima 的 CEO Robert Shaye
  • 創投家 Adam Dell。啥?你不認識他?那你至少該認得他哥哥 Michael Dell 吧?
Carl Icahn 這些舉動的背後,和微軟的 Steve Ballmer 有沒有什麼默契或是私下的合作,是很耐人尋味的。不過這是楊致遠和雅虎董事會要擔心的事情了。我們只要負責看連續劇看不到的好戲就好了啊! XD

話說回來,楊致遠接任 CEO 以後,風波總是不斷。他能夠有時間精力來做好公司重整的工作嗎?我很懷疑。光是應付微軟大巨獸想必就已經筋疲力竭了。現在又來一個 Carl Icahn,恐怕難得有一夜好眠了...

[註] Carl Icahn 是具有傳奇色彩的投資人。他以爭取股東權益聞名,令許多上市公司老闆聞之色變。最近的事蹟是投資摩托羅拉事件。他所投資的公司,通常伴隨著大規模的重整,包括經營階層的重新洗牌與裁員。
[註二] 公開信的全文在這裡可以看到。我照引如下:

SECURITY HOLDERS ARE ADVISED TO READ THE PROXY STATEMENT AND OTHER DOCUMENTS RELATED TO THE SOLICITATION OF PROXIES BY Carl C. Icahn AND HIS AFFILIATES FROM THE STOCKHOLDERS OF YAHOO! INC. FOR USE AT ITS ANNUAL MEETING, WHEN AND IF THEY BECOME AVAILABLE, BECAUSE THEY WILL CONTAIN IMPORTANT INFORMATION, INCLUDING INFORMATION RELATING TO THE PARTICIPANTS IN ANY SUCH PROXY SOLICITATION. WHEN AND IF COMPLETED, A DEFINITIVE PROXY STATEMENT AND A FORM OF PROXY WILL BE MAILED TO STOCKHOLDERS OF YAHOO! INC. AND WILL ALSO BE AVAILABLE AT NO CHARGE AT THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION'S WEBSITE AT HTTP://WWW.SEC.GOV. INFORMATION RELATING TO THE POTENTIAL PARTICIPANTS IN A POTENTIAL PROXY SOLICITATION IS CONTAINED IN EXHIBIT 1 TO THE SCHEDULE 14A BEING FILED TODAY WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION.

                                Carl C. Icahn
ICAHN CAPITAL LP
767 Fifth Avenue, 47th Floor
New York, NY 10153

May 15, 2008

Roy Bostock
Chairman
Yahoo! Inc.
701 First Avenue
Sunnyvale, CA 94089

Dear Mr. Bostock:

It is clear to me that the board of directors of Yahoo has acted irrationally and lost the faith of shareholders and Microsoft. It is quite obvious that Microsoft's bid of $33 per share is a superior alternative to Yahoo's prospects on a standalone basis. I am perplexed by the board's actions. It is irresponsible to hide behind management's more than overly optimistic financial forecasts. It is unconscionable that you have not allowed your shareholders to choose to accept an offer that represented a 72% premium over Yahoo's closing price of $19.18 on the day before the initial Microsoft offer. I and many of your shareholders strongly believe that a combination between Yahoo and Microsoft would form a dynamic company and more importantly would be a force strong enough to compete with Google on the Internet.

During the past week, a number of shareholders have asked me to lead a proxy fight to attempt to remove the current board and to establish a new board which would attempt to negotiate a successful merger with Microsoft, something that in my opinion the current board has completely botched. I believe that a combination between Microsoft and Yahoo is by far the most sensible path for both companies. I have therefore taken the following actions: (1) during the last 10 days, I have purchased approximately 59 million shares and share-equivalents of Yahoo; (2) I have formed a 10-person slate which will stand for election against the current board; and (3) I have sought antitrust clearance from the Federal Trade Commission to acquire up to approximately $2.5 billion worth of Yahoo stock. The biographies of the members of our slate are attached to this letter. A more formal notification is being delivered today to Yahoo under separate cover.

While it is my understanding that you do not intend to enter into any transaction that would impede a Microsoft-Yahoo merger, I am concerned that in several recent press releases you stated that you intend to pursue certain "strategic alternatives". I therefore hope and trust that if there is any question that these "strategic alternatives" might in any way impede a future Microsoft merger you will at the very least allow shareholders to opine on them before embarking on such a transaction.

I sincerely hope you heed the wishes of your shareholders and move expeditiously to negotiate a merger with Microsoft, thereby making a proxy fight unnecessary.

    Sincerely yours,

CARL C. ICAHN

SLATE BIOGRAPHIES

Lucian A. Bebchuk

Lucian Bebchuk is the William J. Friedman and Alicia Townsend Friedman Professor of Law, Economics, and Finance and Director of the Program on Corporate Governance at Harvard Law School. Bebchuk is also a Research Associate of the National Bureau of Economic Research and Inaugural Fellow of the European Corporate Governance Network. Trained in both law and economics, Bebchuk holds an LL.M. and S.J.D. from Harvard Law School and an M.A. and Ph.D in Economics from the Harvard Economics Department. He joined the Harvard Law School faculty in 1986 as an assistant professor, becoming a full professor in 1988, and the Friedman Professor of Law, Economics and Finance in 1998. Bebchuk has written extensively on corporate governance, corporate control, and corporate transactions. He has published more than seventy research articles in academic journals in law, economics, and finance. Upon electing him to membership in 2000, the American Academy of Arts and Sciences cited him as "[o]ne of the nation's leading scholars of law and economics," who "has made major contribution to the study of corporate control, governance, and insolvency." He is the 2007-2008 President of the American Law and Economics Association, and a former chair of the Business Association Section of the American Association of Law Teachers. Bebchuk's recent writings include Pay without Performance: the Unfulfilled Promise of Executive Compensation (Harvard University Press, 2004, co-authored with Jesse Fried), "The Case for Increasing Shareholder Power" (Harvard Law Review, 2005), "The Costs of Entrenched Boards" (Journal of Financial Economics, 2005, co-authored with Alma Cohen), and "The Myth of the Shareholder Franchise" (Virginia Law Review, 2007). Bebchuk has been a frequent contributor to policy making and public discourse in the corporate governance area. He has appeared before the Senate Finance Committee, the House Committee of Financial Services, and the SEC. He has published many op-ed pieces, including in the Wall Street Journal, the New York Times, and the Financial Times. He was included in the list of "100 most influential people in finance" of Treasury & Risk Management and the list of "100 most influential players in corporate governance" of Directorship magazine.

Frank J. Biondi, Jr.

Since March 1999, Mr. Biondi has served as Senior Managing Director of WaterView Advisors LLC, an investment advisor organization. From April 1996 to November 1998, Mr. Biondi served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Universal Studios, Inc. From July 1987 to January 1996, Mr. Biondi served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Viacom, Inc. Mr. Biondi is a director of Amgen Inc., Cablevision Systems Corp., Hasbro, Inc., The Bank of New York Mellon Corporation and Seagate Technology. Mr. Biondi is a graduate of Princeton University and earned a Masters of Business Administration from Harvard University.

John H. Chapple

John Chapple is President of Hawkeye Investments LLC, a privately-owned equity firm investing primarily in telecommunications and real estate ventures frequently working in conjunction with Rally Capital LLC. Prior to forming Hawkeye, John Chapple worked to organize Nextel Partners, a provider of digital wireless services in mid-size and smaller markets throughout the U.S. He became the President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Nextel Partners and its subsidiaries in August of 1998. Nextel Partners went public in February 2000 and was traded on the NASDAQ Exchange. In June 2006, the company was purchased by Sprint Communications. From 1995 to 1997, Mr. Chapple was the President and Chief Operating Officer for Orca Bay Sports and Entertainment in Vancouver, B.C. During Mr. Chapple's tenure, Orca Bay owned and operated Vancouver's National Basketball Association and National Hockey League sports franchises in addition to the General Motors Place sports arena and retail interests. From 1988 to 1995, he served as Executive Vice President of Operations for McCaw Cellular Communications and subsequently AT&T Wireless Services following the merger of those companies. From 1978 to 1983, he served on the senior management team of Rogers Cablesystems before moving to American Cablesystems as Senior Vice President of Operations from 1983 to 1988. Mr. Chapple, a graduate of Syracuse University and Harvard University's Advanced Management Program, has 26 years of experience in the cable television and wireless communications industries. Mr. Chapple is the past Chairman of Cellular One Group and CTIA-The Wireless Association, past Vice-Chairman of the Cellular Telecommunications Industry Association and has been on the Board of Governors of the NHL and NBA. Mr. Chapple serves on the Syracuse University Board of Trustees currently as Chairman and the Advisory Board for the Maxwell School of Syracuse University. He is also on the Board of Directors of Cbeyond, Inc., a publicly traded Atlanta-based integrated service telephony company; Seamobile Enterprises, a privately held company providing integrated wireless services at sea; Telesphere, a privately held VOIP (voice over internet protocol) company based in Phoenix, Arizona; and on the advisory boards of Diamond Castle Holdings, LLC, a private equity firm based in New York City and the Daniel J. Evans School of Public Affairs at University of Washington.

Mark Cuban

Since early 2000, Mr. Cuban has been the majority and controlling owner of the National Basketball Association franchise, the Dallas Mavericks. In 2001, Mr. Cuban co-founded HDNet, an all high-definition television network on DIRECTV that broadcasts high-definition sports, movies and other entertainment. Prior to his purchase of the Dallas Mavericks, Mr. Cuban co- founded Broadcast.com in 1995 and served as its Chairman of the Board until it was sold to Yahoo! in July of 1999. Before Broadcast.com, Mr. Cuban co-founded MicroSolutions, a national systems integrator, in 1983, which was later sold to CompuServe Corporation in 1990. Mr. Cuban is an active investor in cutting- edge technologies and various industries, including the entertainment industry.

Adam Dell

Since January 2000, Mr. Dell has served as the Managing General Partner of Impact Venture Partners, a venture capital firm focused on information technology investments. He also serves as Managing Director at Steelpoint Capital Partners, a private equity firm with offices in New York and California. From October 1998 to January 2000, Mr. Dell was a Senior Associate and subsequently a Partner with Crosspoint Venture Partners in Northern California. From July 1997 to August 1998, he was a Senior Associate with Enterprise Partners in Southern California. From January 1996 to June 1997 Mr. Dell was associated with the law firm of Winstead Sechrest & Minick, in Austin, Texas, where he practiced corporate law. Mr. Dell's investments include: Buzzsaw (which was acquired by Autodesk), HotJobs (which was acquired by Yahoo!) and Connectify (which was acquired by Kana Software). Mr. Dell has been a director of XO Holdings, Inc., a telecommunications services provider, since February 2006, and of its predecessor from January 2003 to February 2006. In addition, Mr. Dell currently serves on the boards of directors of the Santa Fe Institute, MessageOne and OpenTable. He also teaches a course at the Columbia Business School on business, technology and innovation and is a contributing columnist to the technology publication, Business 2.0. Mr. Dell received a J.D. from University of Texas and a B.A. from Tulane University.

Carl C. Icahn

Mr. Icahn has served as chairman of the board and a director of Starfire Holding Corporation, a privately-held holding company, and chairman of the board and a director of various subsidiaries of Starfire, since 1984. Since August 2007, through his position as Chief Executive Officer of Icahn Capital LP, a wholly owned subsidiary of Icahn Enterprises L.P., and certain related entities, Mr. Icahn's principal occupation is managing private investment funds, including Icahn Partners LP, Icahn Partners Master Fund LP, Icahn Partners Master Fund II L.P. and Icahn Partners Master Fund III L.P. Prior to August 2007, Mr. Icahn conducted this occupation through his entities CCI Onshore Corp. and CCI Offshore Corp since September 2004. Since November 1990, Mr. Icahn has been chairman of the board of Icahn Enterprises G.P. Inc., the general partner of Icahn Enterprises L.P. Icahn Enterprises L.P. is a diversified holding company engaged in a variety of businesses, including investment management, metals, real estate and home fashion. Mr. Icahn was chairman of the board and president of Icahn & Co., Inc., a registered broker- dealer and a member of the National Association of Securities Dealers, from 1968 to 2005. Mr. Icahn has served as chairman of the board and as a director of American Railcar Industries, Inc., a company that is primarily engaged in the business of manufacturing covered hopper and tank railcars, since 1994. From October 1998 through May 2004, Mr. Icahn was the president and a director of Stratosphere Corporation, the owner and operator of the Stratosphere Hotel and Casino in Las Vegas, which, until February 2008, was a subsidiary of Icahn Enterprises L.P. From September 2000 to February 2007, Mr. Icahn served as the chairman of the board of GB Holdings, Inc., which owned an interest in Atlantic Coast Holdings, Inc., the owner and operator of The Sands casino in Atlantic City until November 2006. Mr. Icahn has been chairman of the board and a director of XO Holdings, Inc., a telecommunications services provider, since February 2006, and of its predecessor from January 2003 to February 2006. Mr. Icahn has served as a Director of Cadus Corporation, a company engaged in the ownership and licensing of yeast-based drug discovery technologies since July 1993. In May 2005, Mr. Icahn became a director of Blockbuster Inc., a provider of in-home movie rental and game entertainment. In October 2005, Mr. Icahn became a director of WestPoint International, Inc., a manufacturer of bed and bath home fashion products. In September 2006, Mr. Icahn became a director of ImClone Systems Incorporated, a biopharmaceutical company, and since October 2006 has been the chairman of the board of ImClone. In August 2007, Mr. Icahn became a director of WCI Communities, Inc., a homebuilding company, and since September 2007 has been the chairman of the board of WCI. In December 2007, Mr. Icahn became a director of Federal-Mogul Corporation, a supplier of automotive products, and since January 2008 has been the chairman of the board of Federal-Mogul. In April 2008, Mr. Icahn became a director of Motricity, Inc., a privately-held company that provides mobile content services and solutions. Mr. Icahn received his B.A. from Princeton University.

Keith A. Meister

Since March 2006, Keith Meister has served as Principal Executive Officer and Vice Chairman of the Board of Icahn Enterprises G.P. Inc., the general partner of Icahn Enterprises L.P., a diversified holding company engaged in a variety of businesses, including investment management, metals, real estate and home fashion. Since November 2004, Mr. Meister has been a Managing Director of Icahn Capital LP, the entity through which Carl C. Icahn manages third party private investment funds. Since June 2002, Mr. Meister has served as senior investment analyst of High River Limited Partnership, an entity primarily engaged in the business of holding and investing in securities. Mr. Meister also serves on the boards of directors of the following companies: XO Holdings, Inc., a telecommunications company; WCI Communities, Inc., a homebuilding company; Federal-Mogul Corporation, a supplier of automotive products; and Motorola, Inc., a mobile communications company. With respect to each company mentioned above, Carl C. Icahn, directly or indirectly, either (i) controls such company or (ii) has an interest in such company through the ownership of securities. Mr. Meister received an A.B. in government, cum laude, from Harvard College in 1995.

Edward H. Meyer

Mr. Meyer serves as Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Investment Officer of Ocean Road Advisors, Inc., an investment management company. From 1970 to 2006, he served as Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of Grey Global Group, Inc., a multi-billion dollar global advertising and marketing agency. Mr. Meyer serves as a Director of Harman International Industries, Inc., Ethan Allen Interiors, Inc., National CineMedia, Inc. and NRDC Acquisition Corp. Mr. Meyer holds a B.A. in Economics from Cornell University.

Brian S. Posner

Brian S. Posner is a private investor. From 2005 through March 2008, he served as Chief Executive Officer and co-Chief Investment Officer of ClearBridge Advisors LLC (and its predecessor company, CAM North America), an asset management company based in New York with approximately $90 billion in assets and a wholly owned subsidiary of Legg Mason Inc. Prior to ClearBridge Advisors, he was a co-Founder and the Managing Partner of Hygrove Partners LLC, a hedge fund company that was formed in 2000. Prior to ClearBridge Advisors and Hygrove Partners, he served as a Portfolio Manager and an Analyst, first at Fidelity Investments from 1987 to 1996 and then at Warburg Pincus Asset Management/Credit Suisse Asset Management from 1997 to 1999. At Warburg Pincus Asset Management/Credit Suisse Asset Management he was a Managing Director and served as the Senior Investment Manager of the Value Equity Group, co-Portfolio Manager of the Warburg Pincus Growth & Income Fund, and Portfolio Manager of the Warburg Pincus Institutional Value Fund and the Warburg Pincus Trust, Growth and Income Fund. Prior to the acquisition of Warburg Pincus Asset Management ("WPAM") by Credit Suisse Asset Management in July 1999, he was co-Chief Investment Officer, Director of Research, Chairman of the Global Asset Allocation Committee, and a member of the Executive Operating Committee at WPAM. At Fidelity Investments, he was the Portfolio Manager of the Fidelity Equity Income II Fund from 1992 to 1996 and the Fidelity Value Fund from 1990 to 1992. He also managed the Select Life Insurance, Select Property Casualty Insurance and Select Energy Portfolios. From 1987 to 1990, he was an Oil, Insurance, and Financial Services Analyst. From August 2000 to April 2003 he served on the Board of Directors for Sotheby's Holdings, Inc. He currently a member of the Board of Trustees at Northwestern University and the Board of Visitors for the Weinberg College of Arts and Sciences at Northwestern University. Mr. Posner received his undergraduate degree in history from Northwestern University in 1983 and his M.B.A. in finance from the University of Chicago Graduate School of Business in 1987.

Robert K. Shaye

Robert Shaye is Co-Chairman and Co-CEO of New Line Cinema. As the Founder of New Line Cinema and a filmmaker himself, Robert Shaye has spent more than 40 years developing and distributing films that reflect a wide array of cultural movements, creating new paradigms for the motion picture business, and most importantly, entertaining millions of moviegoers. Since he founded New Line in 1967, Shaye has guided the company's growth from a privately-held art film distributor to one of the entertainment industry's leading independent studios and a veritable box office force. He has been involved in such films as The Lord of the Rings trilogy, Rush Hour, Austin Powers and Seven. A University of Michigan graduate with a degree in business administration and a J.D. degree from Columbia University Law School, Shaye is also a Fulbright Scholar, member of the New York State Bar, and serves on the Board of Trustees of the Motion Picture Pioneers, and the American Film Institute.


Read more...

flickr 開始支援影音了

>> 2008/04/10

傳言已久的 flickr video 終於推出了。雖然如此,但是只允許 90 秒長度的限制、只有 pro member 能夠使用,加上沒有類似 jumpcut 編輯影片的功能,看來影響力十分有限。

但是對我來說,保存自製的 memorable videos 剛剛好合適。也許這才是 flickr 的用意吧。隨文附貼一個當年 HeatoN 小槍局逆轉、一人幹掉強敵 4k 一整隊的經典場面。大家可以看看影片撥放的效果。



另外,我抱怨已久的 flickr uploadr,也終於推出新版了,當然新的 uploadr 也支援影音。不過我還沒測試中文問題到底這版修好了沒... 試了這麼多版其實也沒什麼信心了 *_*

[Update] 看來 3.1 版終於修好了。

Read more...

flickr 邁入 farm4 了!

>> 2008/02/22

新傳上 flickr 的照片都會在 farm4 上面出現了。記得 flickr 沒多久前才破 20 億張照片,前幾天寫 blog 傳的照片編號就已經是 22 億多了。當時 flickr 每秒要接收三千多張新照片,不知道現在這個數字是多少?

不過話說回來,我還是希望 flickr 先把 uploadr 搞的好一點再說。畢竟離 3.0.5 版推出也好一陣子了,可是狀況還是一樣糟,許多 bug 還是沒修好啊...

Anyway,這張是我第一張在 farm4 的照片,紀念一下 XD
IMG_7156

Read more...

YUI 2.5.0 release

>> 2008/02/21

傳言已久的 YUI 2.5.0 終於出了。

看來這個版本,改變比較大的,是多了類似 flickr uploader 之類的 uploader、從這邊 merge 過去的 image cropper、類似新版 Y! Mail 的 layout、改良過的 datatable,以及更強悍的 profiler。

除此之外,也多了方便的 resize 工具,和看來不知道有什麼用的 cookie...

Read more...

微軟提議用 446 億美金收購 Yahoo

>> 2008/02/02

今天在 San Jose 旅館剛起床,到處都在講的新聞就是微軟提議用 446 億美金 (44.6 billion) 收購 Yahoo。消息一出,Yahoo 股價開盤應聲大漲接近五成,來到 28 元的水準。

YHOO 股價漲近五成

市場顯然十分喜歡這個 bid,也表示華爾街對 Yahoo 只靠自己的 restructure 和奮鬥是否能夠翻身已經不再具備任何耐心。由這種股價反映看來,華爾街顯然希望有外部的 executive 進來,或者尤其是微軟這種具有戰略性角色的公司來作收購。

這種股價曲線,看在眼裡,實在感觸不少。現在 Yahoo 已經淪落到即使股價漲了 50% 都還只有 28 元的水準了。在各界都對 Yahoo 喪失信心的時候,微軟的收購是否能夠替 Yahoo 重新帶來新生命?成敗當然還在未定之天。可是有希望總比沒希望好,金融市場總是希望有夢想。而夢想正是 Yahoo 沒辦法提供的。

如果你問我,我覺得 Yahoo 是否應該答應?我會說,"the short answer is yes"。
你想問更詳細一點的話,我會說,"the long answer is a bit longer, but it's still yes"。

Read more...

話說 Yahoo! 奇摩生活+ 的 API...

>> 2008/01/25

話說 YDN 台灣版浩浩蕩蕩的 launch 了,台灣這邊也相對應推出了生活+ 的 api 來打頭陣。可是除了上次 YDN 研討會上 tempo 學長開砲的一天兩千次 request 實在太少以外,還有個小問題。如果點下去「生活+ Beta v0.1」,進去看 API 詳細資訊的時候...

如果點下第一頁看到的前兩個 link,想看看 API server 的話...

Yahoo!奇摩生活+ Open API_1200727371609

迎接我們的就是 404 error @_@

Yahoo! - 404 Not Found_1200727389515

Read more...

Yahoo 公佈 OpenID solution 了

>> 2008/01/19

Well, Yahoo 終於正式加入 OpenID 陣營了。自從前陣子 Yahoo 宣布 flickr API 可以套 OpenID 之後,許多人就在等這最後的臨門一腳。有興趣的可以看 http://openid.yahoo.com/。

稍微看了一下,似乎是拿 Yahoo 原本的 BBAuth 來串的。所以使用者要在 OpenID 輸入欄位上面打 yahoo.com,然後再被導去 BBAuth 那邊做認證。仔細想想,以 Yahoo 的包袱當然不可能像是 MyOpenID 那樣大方搞 xxx.myopenid.com,但是連個類似 AOL 的 http://openid.aol.com/<screen_name> 都沒有搞,好像誠意不太夠啊 XD 這樣難道對方 site 收到 Yahoo user 來的 identifier 就都是 "yahoo.com" 嗎?

換句話回來說,對使用者來講,OpenID 推不起來主因之一就是門檻略高。使用者可不愛打一堆亂七八糟長的 url,從這個角度來說只打 yahoo.com 似乎是個稍有改進的解法。但是對 user 來說,他們最希望的應該還是「Y 牌使用者點這裡就可以登入」。看來還是 BBAuth 稍微 promising 一點啊... 雖然 2 week expiry 有點遜,不過如果只是要辨認 userhash,倒是不受 token expiry 的限制呢。

Read more...

Yahoo! 奇摩關鍵字也在幫 Google Analytics 打廣告就對了

>> 2007/11/29

話說,剛剛在小睡睡這邊看到,直覺就想到以前這篇....

那時候我還在唸,「bix 自從被 Yahoo 買走以後還是掛著 analytics 不放,原因想必不用多做說明了吧」,結果事隔半年,bix 不只依然故我現在還放著 Google Analytics,連 Yahoo! 奇摩關鍵字廣告的網頁也被爆破在放 Google Analytics...

這意思,應該比半年前我說的「原因想必不用我多說」更明白了吧。話不用說太白,看的懂的就是看的懂了 :p

ysm

Read more...

Yahoo! 奇摩難道要去香港上市了嗎?

>> 2007/11/20

Well,大家都知道,經濟部商業司有個可以查詢工商登記的地方。當年找到「科高」也是多虧這個查詢網站。今天下午一時好奇,想翻查一些網路公司登記的營業項目不曉得都列些什麼。順手打「雅虎」下去查,跟以前一樣有很多其他阿里不打的公司用「雅虎」登記公司名稱。沒想到這時候突然發現...

yahoo_工商查詢_2

(你可以點這裡看大圖) 啥?Yahoo! 奇摩什麼時候變成「香港商雅虎資訊」了?而且英文名稱還是「YAHOO! TAIWAN HOLDINGS LIMITED」,是 Yahoo! 奇摩轉型當控股公司了嗎?@_@ 應該是被不知道哪個怪香港人註冊的公司名吧?當下立刻點下去看登記的資料:

yahoo_工商查詢_3

(一樣,點這裡可以看大圖) 哇塞,還真的耶。連公司地址都和正牌的「雅虎國際資訊」一樣,而且「訴訟及非訴訟代理人姓名」也確實是... !那現在的 Yahoo! 奇摩網站,在台灣到達率超過98%,到底是「雅虎國際資訊」呢,還是「香港商雅虎資訊」才對?誰搞的清楚?

其實哪一個才對我也不太 care。我比較好奇的是,他們這樣轉變的背後意義是什麼呢?之前我曾經聽說過一些公司,為了處理勞退舊制和新制的問題,乾脆成立一個新公司,把舊公司的員工「解雇」,再由新公司重新 hire 這樣。可是雅虎奇摩在之前並沒有這樣做,反而是現在改頭換面變成香港公司,不禁讓人直覺聯想... 難道是準備趁香港股市正熱,到香港上市嗎?

當然這只是我的胡亂猜測。但是如果是真的,這一著可也真不錯。反正現在恆生指數熱成這樣,眼看著阿里巴巴這種網站都可以在香港上市當天立刻漲三倍,本益比超過 100 倍的時候,大股東跟著眼紅心動恐怕是難免的。只是,這個猜測到底是離譜到不行,還是稍微沾到一點邊,就只有天才知道了....

Read more...

GMail 的 spam 狀況

>> 2007/10/30

大家會用 GMail 多半都是因為他比較快、用 GMail 聽起來比較 cool,或者是因為 GMail 的垃圾信真的很少。

spamchart剛剛在這裡看到右邊這張有趣的圖,是 Google 拿來宣揚自己對抗廣告信有成的戰績。圖表看起來相當漂亮,GMail 誤判的廣告信比率始終很低,而且三年來不斷下降。

相對的,在現在 Spam Email 一天比一天更多的情況下,spammer 寄給 GMail 的廣告信反而呈現下降的趨勢 - 表示這些 spammer 或許根本就已經放棄在 GMail 發廣告信了,而轉戰其他比較容易發成功的 Email provider。

回過頭來看 Yahoo 的話,Yahoo Mail 宣布信箱容量無上限已經有一段時間了。現在的 Yahoo Mail 介面也做的炫目華麗,用很精巧的 Ajax 把整個信箱做的跟 outlook 介面差不多。但是偏偏 Yahoo 垃圾信多的跟鳥蛋一樣,判斷垃圾信的準確度大概只有 50% 而已 - 跟 GMail 這張圖所顯示出來,接近 100% 的數字顯然差異甚遠。而且,在 Yahoo Mail 點選「這是垃圾信」永遠都沒有效果!

我每個從 Yahoo Mail 跳槽 Gmail 的朋友,全部都是因為受不了太多 spam。Yahoo 顯然也知道這個問題的存在,不過什麼時候才能比較有明顯的改善呢?也許在這個問題解決以前,Yahoo Mail 都解決不了使用者流失到敵營的狀況吧。

話說回來,GMail 的 engineer 居然還配合拍了一個公關短片?實在滿好笑的 :p

Read more...

出槌的 YK 首頁...

>> 2007/07/19

嗯,啊... 雖然貼文的時候已經正常了,不過有圖有真相,既然抓了圖就貼一下吧...

index1

點選第一則新聞下去的時候...

index2

Orz

Read more...

Yahoo! CEO Terry Semel 下台了

>> 2007/06/19

這幾天網路界的大事,應該就是 Yahoo! 的 CEO Terry Semel 終於下台了,楊致遠 Jerry Yang 重新上台掌兵符。在 Yahoo! 官方 blog 上也宣佈了這個消息。

其實去年,就在 Yahoo! 股價跌跌不修的時候,我一直以為 Terry Semel 要閃人了。當時的投資人怨聲載道,幾個關鍵計畫例如 Panama 一延再延,華爾街實在是沒有什麼耐心多給他機會。我也已為去年十月 Yahoo! 的 re-org 會讓他下台,換當時的 COO Dan Rosenweig 繼位成為 CEO,沒想到局面剛好相反,董事會決定再給 Terry 一個機會,反過來把 Dan 砍掉 XD

不過畢竟一個連 email 都不用的 CEO,在網路泡沫的谷底或許適合帶領網路公司發展媒體公司之路 (你看 Tom Cruise 就會去 Sunnyvale 而不是 Google 的 Mountain View XD) ,但是在現在新技術大鳴大放的回溫時期,Terry 或許就不是一個上選的 CEO 了。

沒想到現在,Terry Semel 真的下台了,換成老面孔 Jerry Yang 回頭力挽狂瀾。正在走下坡的公司換老闆,華爾街當然喜歡。因為換老闆代表新走向,走下坡的公司有新走向代表有希望。但是這次 Jerry Yang 能不能帶著 Yahoo! 重新殺出一條自己的路?就有待觀察了...

不過很多人認為 Yahoo! 當年完全 ignore 掉搜尋市場是錯的,也認為 Terry Semel 完全錯過這個大餅,我的看法卻完全不一樣。事後諸葛當然很容易推敲一些簡單的結論出來,但是 Search 的市場真的很大嗎? ... Search 之所以是一個大市場、Google 之所以能夠靠這個賺錢,因為所有人都到 Google 做 search。

換言之,只要這種情況不改變,那麼不管 Google 用 search 做什麼生意,都可以賺錢。因為這根本是一家獨大的市場,跟當年的微軟沒有兩樣。

重點不是 search 的市場,重點在於 Google 把一個市場弄到獨大了。Yahoo! 要怎麼走自己的路,就要看 Jerry Yang 怎麼重新定位走向了...

Read more...

大規模購併風潮再現?Microsoft 併購 Yahoo 傳言再起

>> 2007/05/05

看來併購風潮還未止歇,而且越演越烈。會不會再掀起 80 年代 LBO、MBO 的狂潮呢?也許有人會告訴我說這已經開始發生了吧?

晚上碰到前同事跟我說,今晚 YHOO 開盤大漲十幾趴,後來查證似乎是受到微軟併購傳聞影響。相關資料可以看華爾街日報的報導 (不過只有摘要就是了)。

yhoo

微軟和 Yahoo 之前就已經談過又破局,這次在 Google 買下 DoubleClick 之後是不是感到壓力更迫切了呢?還是有其他的原因?不過不管這次商談成局與否,翻閱最近的新聞,世界各地併購聲總是傳不完啊... 先不管某些 6 哥哥 7 弟弟一直提的網路併購風潮,光是最近大的併購案就不少:
  • Royal Bank of Scotland 被英國的 Barclays 用 660 億歐元 (大約 $900 億美金) 買下。
  • 就在上述消息公佈的幾天之後,Royal Bank of Scotland 決定參與競標 ABN AMRO。據說商談價碼高達 720 億歐元。
  • 在葡萄牙,Millennium BCP 重提了購併條件,希望用 53 億歐元 (約 $72 億美金) 買下 Banco BPI。
  • 瑞典藥廠 AstraZeneca 決定買下生技藥廠 MedImmune,價碼 $156 億美金。
  • 重量級私募基金 KKR 大致敲定買下 Alliance Boots,價碼 111 億英鎊 (大約 $220 億美金)。KKR 的 offer 也是歐洲有史以來最大規模的 LBO。
  • 法國的家樂福買了巴西的 Atacadao,一家當地的量販店。價碼 $11 億美金。在這樁併購案之後,家樂福成為巴西最大的零售商。
在這無止境的併購案後面,我們可以看的出來,併購不只是發生在網路界,而是各行各業、跨國進行。在全球化高喊了這麼多年的現在,企業的國界也終於越來越平坦了。

[Update]:關於 MS 併購 Yahoo 的傳聞,從 Chen 兄的這篇看來,似乎是已經再度告吹了 :p

Read more...

最新文章

最新回應

部落格貼紙

  © Free Blogger Templates Autumn Leaves by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP